O hai Cheez Frends! Need sumfing to do on Friday nite? Well go see Dinner For Schmucks starring funneh men Steve Carrell and Paul Rudd, and you will laff ur head off. Ur kitteh will be jealous that he couldn’t join in on the fun.
Click to see All Kittehs | Captions Only | Videos Only
« Previous NINJA KITTEH | Gif: Tragic Cat is Tragic Next »


Why r we gittin movie ads?
mmm – spam. sponsored links stinks, bty.
cheezeburger – if u don’t gotz nuffin’ funneh to say, SAY NUFFIN’!
k?
Okay… NUFFIN’!
^.^
Leebz me cawld! Dunno wat dis haz 2 du wiv dis plaes.
Wel, it duz say “Sponsored” but itz a bad ideer !!
Why are there no cats in this video? I’m scared and confused!
Yay! You sold out!
You’re implying Cheezburger hasn’t already sold out, like, a million months ago.
(The aforementioned amount of months may have been exaggerated.)
Sold out? Tell me, are you paying to access this site? No? Didn’t think so.
Do you think that servers, bandwidth, and electricity are free?
sumtinkz gottah pae teh billz!
Believe me, I know a lot about internet advertizing, and there are enought ads everywere in the site to pay the bill. This is just a little extra…
idont quite fink so, this is one of teh worlds largest lol sites. it was eben on teh yahoo news
We interrupt your spam for an overwhelming dose of I-don’t-f***ing care.
Besides, Steve Carell is rapidly falling into the same rut that Will Ferrell did–playing variations on the same character in every film he’s in. He would have done far better to stay with The Daily Show.
Diz no kurrect spel. Yuo neid to goez bah to skuol. Taek lol-kat-terature claass to eimproov spel. ur uelkum
Moar adz? Do.Not.Liek.
Luv,
Teh Kittehs n Hoomins o da ICHC univerz.
Dat man creeps me owut jus like teh Jim Carrey. Pleah Do not Want!
Word of advice.. Don’t fall into the same cycle as teh rest of teh internetz. If the site revenue has hit a plateau, either deal with it and live within your means, so to speak, or actually get creative and find another way to draw in users. But when content starts being usurped by ads, your doing nothing but driving off the people who’s traffic you live off of. People come here to see kitteh’s, not ads.
100% agree! This SUX!
Please explain how a website can “live within its means” when more and more people visit it, which require more and more server power and bandwidth, both of which cost money?
Because the more viewers they have the more they can charge the advertisers. That’s how advertising works. Why do you think Super Bowl ads are so expensive? It’s because there are more people watching it than a regular football game. If ICHC isn’t raising their ad rates as viewership has increased that’s their own fault.
We all understand the site needs the ads to survive. But mixing in non-relevant ads with the content is not the way to do it.
Totally agrre. Look at other wesites:
like newgrounds.
They also do have to pay servers and bandwith, but they do not have that much ads!
As others have noted, this is a blatant and shameless ad and has no place in the main thread of this site. It belongs on the side with the other ads, which are offensive enough to begin with but are, I suppose, a necessary evil.
Okay, ICHC….enough with the videos. Give them their own page!!!!
agree wif u an meanjellybean.
ooh ick wat dis hareball doin in OUR space, dudes?
Here’s an idea–on a humor site, you might want to try advertising something that’s ACTUALLY FUNNY. Seeing this ad has guaranteed that I’ll NEVER go to see this flop.
Better placement for this ad would be on FailBlog.org.
Can’t agree moar!!
A question for all the people complaining about the in-content ads:
Would you be willing to pay for a subscription to not see the in-content ads?
You would think all the ads everywhere else on the site would be enough. Passing them off as “content” is insulting.
And yes, if I could view a completely ad-free version I would consider paying for that.
Great point. I am offended by most of the comments here.
We have ads on the top, bottom and multiple ads on the sides: why would you insert more in the middle and pass it off as content? You didn’t even pretend to care about whether it appealed to your viewers. By all that’s furry you could have at least advertised a cat related movie and saved this ad for the fail blog.
Don’t you think “Cats & Dogs 2 The Revenge of Kitty Galore” is more topic-related, if you just HAVE to promote a movie?! Not that it’s probably any funnier, but, still.
Why would I come to this site any more when about 80% of all the data content is advertising, and now this? I’ve been reading ICHC since it was a much simpler beast, and although it delights me that a stream of captioned cats can fuel a whole empire of funnies and revenue with actual employees, this screams “revolution eating its children” to me.
WAY off base! A plug for Cat & Dogs I could tolerate – at least it’s thematic. But this piece of crap…?
I realize that this is a for-profit website, but this is too much.
Gib da monies u got fur dis ad to da local kitteh resku hom!
Ads with my kittehs?!?!?
DO NOT WANT!!!!!
worst thing is that it’s a remake of “le diner de cons” 1997 french movie…
I’m so glad I’m not the only one who realized this…
Plus one — and the French original was excellent!
Lol, “le diner de cons” is a great movie. As a French person, I never understood why hollywood had to make remakes?
Indeed. Every time a really good French movie is made, Hollywood feels the need to remake it. As if their big budget would automatically make it better. A lot of my friends speak only very little English. When they want to see a Hollywood movie, they see it dubbed or subbed. And if it’s anything like Taxi, the Hollywood version will be an insulting dumbed down version with explosions… check it out, they’ll make the soup explode or something…
(Sorry if I make mistakes, English is not my first language)
Don’t click “play”. Saw Carell on some chat show and he explained the premise of this film. Repulsive. Movie reviews (not the ads) do me the service of providing enough information about films to decide whether they’re worth seeing. Most are not.
Another great movie idea – Stolen from the French. I love how Americans love to hate the French – and steal all their movie ideas. This movie has been renowned in France for something like 20 years. Can’t Hollywood come up with their OWN ideas once in a while?
The way Carell described it made it sound like a lousy movie idea. But there’s no accounting for taste.
The original was actually really good, but mainly because of the cast. The humor is a bit like a Will Farrell movie, take away the American redneck humor and add uppity French indignation.
I agree. Remake = how to make bad movies with good movies….
Well, now I tink I won’t see dis movie. Take dat, sellouts. >:3
WTF? Wy is dere crap on da front page? Now mebbe I not go to frunt page at all.
This is as bad as that time a year or 2 ago when an ad for “Hotel For Dogs” was captioned and submitted as a LOL. Whoever did it didn’t even try to hide that it was basically an ad.
Oh, PLEASE don’t go down this road. So obnoxious. I love ICHC and that just put a really baaaad taste in my mouth–like a soy burger topped with a slice of Pasteurized Processed American Cheese Food.
Why are so many people complaining about ads on the borders? Don’t you people know what AdBlockPlus is? I didn’t even know this site had ads till I saw you guys complaining about it.
Boooooo! Sponsored content needs its own page.
Adz iz adz, lolz iz lolz, OK, but adz pretending az lolz NOT OK.
DO NOT WANT
same!
DO NOT WANT!
It’s not like they’re forcing anyone to watch the preview. How ’bout just not hitting play and scrolling past it. I really don’t understand what the big deal is.
It’s not like anyone’s forcing you to read the comments. How ’bout just not hitting the comments link and scrolling past it. I really don’t understand what the big deal is.
Yeah, the funny thing about that argument, aside from how stupid and meaningless it is, is that it can always be just as legitimately used against you once it’s brought up. Try a better one next time.
So I can only have an opinion if I agree with the majority? I wasn’t trying to start an argument, I was simply giving an opinion. But thank you so much for putting me in my place, it was so very thoughtful of you.
By the way, if my comment was so ‘stupid and meaningless’, why did you feel it so important to reply to it? Why don’t you take your own advice and try better next time….
oh, goody. Blatant commercialism. It’s not enough with the banner ads, the sidebars, headers and footers, and all the rest of it. Now we have “vids” that are tawdry movie promos. Sad, guys. But hey, it’s the pockets full of money that count, right?
We don’t need advertisements on here, do we?