« Previous | Next »

FUN


funny-cat-pictures-fun

FUN
is sharing happiness with someone

picture: Hotel For Dogs / Paramount, lol caption:

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Lolspeak translashun: Fancy house for goggies, teh moovie:

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 110 comments

Hey, what's with all the misspelled words?

» Learn Lolspeak — teh furst language born of teh intertubes.

 
  1. Annipuss says:

    Liek playin heer

  2. calicocoa says:

    limmarik tyme?

    teh goggiez tehy hadda hoetell,
    adn tehy thawht it wuz reellee qyte swel.

    (yoer trn nao…)

  3. brainfire says:

    teh windz n ur hairz…
    n ur mouf…
    n ur aiz…
    n ur nozez…
    lief iz gud!1!

  4. woodchuck says:

    Iz dis reelee a Moovee ad masker8in as a cheezburgr?
    .
    I is nawt shur I uh proov.

  5. James says:

    Species fail.

    Why’s this under LOLCats?

  6. Freckle_Duck says:

    No is good movie! I seen it, is very good.
    Annipuss, Ah seez yuu eberywhares, yuu is very famus on teh cheezburger webs. ;) yuu good at teh cheezweb comunicashun!:)

  7. Tori says:

    Wayt, dese goggies :o wai dey awn ICHC nd nawt IHAH?

  8. vt4000 says:

    Ads in lols, I hate dem

  9. AliCat says:

    Ai’m finking u has mixt up ur loldogs and lolcats dis mornin cheezpeeps. Dis wun shud be ober in hotgoggie land and dat wun dere shud be in cheezlands.

  10. Phillipe d'Beaker says:

    yay!! we can has infiltrated teh ichc!! snerk!! but we’z goggies (heh heh ai said but). yep. yep yep yep. naow wut do we does? i dunno. anybuddy gut any fuds? hey! maybe tehre’s sum kittehs around…..

  11. Ozzy_kat says:

    Very very true Alicat

  12. Cat says:

    dis nawt lolcatz, dis lolgoggies

  13. Esmeralda says:

    boohoo.
    no like goggies in mah cheezburger :(

  14. KaBooM says:

    They are both dogs… why on the cat site?

    • unicorn rider says:

      It’s obviously a paid promotional piece for the movie. An ad that isn’t supposed to look like and ad. but since the dog site doesn’t get many viewers, they’re running it here to.

      • upfi says:

        U is probablol rite, aifinkso. Mush as ai laik goggies and dun’t mind dem visiting here on ICHC, ai do objeckt to plain commershals. Hrmph!

  15. mary says:

    Wot dese goggies dooin’ on lolcat page? Get dems off!!!

  16. n8urgrl says:

    neber thot comershal ads for goggies wuld be on lolpaig front nsted uv lolcatz. wuts da wurldz kumin tu?

  17. angelzrealm says:

    advertisement for movie. new low

  18. FernandoDANTE says:

    I know you gotta pay the bills and all, but this sucks. It’s not even lolworthy.

  19. I can’t believe this CRAP made the front page. There are lots of REALLY FUNNY lolz waiting to be put on the front page but advertisements for stupid movies make it to fp? wtf?

  20. kittywinks says:

    Ish not funny
    Has goggies in it
    Ish blatant ad for crummy film

    ICHC, why must u test mah faith lik dis?
    FAIL :(

  21. Richard says:

    Am ai onlee oen finks goggies aren’t berry funnay? Kittehs aer waaay moer funnayerer.

  22. Kyuoote pik, adn Ai luuves goggies, ALAWT!!!

    Butt tihs ar aowt ov plaise heer; iys an aowtrite advert taht smakks ov kummershalism; …….Waaaaaaaaaah!!!!!

  23. Babs says:

    Blatant advertisement is blatant.

  24. Catman says:

    In all the time I have spent here, I’ve never commented before. But this is only an advertisement for a poorly reviewed dog comedy, and not even remotely funny. The ICHC mods should remove this. This drags the site down and does not even fit the whole spirit of ICHC. Shame on the studio hacks who put this here.

    • upfi says:

      Anom, lurker brutha!!! And welkum! Ai has a happi dat u made urself known and ai has a sad at teh saym tyme dat u shud habs to commint on such a despicablol NAWT-LOL.

      • leeza-b says:

        *shrugs*
        for all we knows, this is wot paid for teh cheezez to fix teh 200 commint bork, and teh unable-2-favrit bork. And if sew, bring on sum more commershuls, so we can get teh burgers back!!
        *runs bak to teh current lol wif a kwikness*

  25. Theo says:

    Ohhhh this is hilarious. You have no idea. :D

    We’ve been running this ad, y’know, over at that place where I work, in a similar way. And of COURSE there’s been all the BAWWWWWW SELLOUTS WAAAAH complaints, and the YOU’VE RUINED MY C.O. YOU BASTARTS I’M GOING OVER TO ICHC UNTIL THIS AD GOES AWAAAAAY HAH SO THERE. To which I replied, Sure, not a problem, until somebody goes & buys inline adspace over there too (that is, here) — THEN watch what happens.

    It is quite possible that some of the trolling you see here is spillover, and for that, you have my sympathies. (REMINDER TO CERTAIN BRATS WITH AN OVERINFLATED SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT: Some of us work for a living.)

    Cheers! Carry on…

    • Theo says:

      (like, oh just for instance, “Nule” up there. “DIAF” = “Die In A Fire”. Niiice.)

      • skwirrlgrrl says:

        ooo, someone sed fyre??
        *puts on FRU’s*
        *dials nine-elebenty*
        *puts on glittur i-lashez*

      • Nule says:

        Run your ads, that’s fine, I sell ad space on my website as well. Just don’t pretend it’s content. I actually assume the makers of that movie or whatever it was snuck it in here, not that it was misleadingly placed by the administrators.

        I’ve come to accept paying for my content by looking at ads on sites, no need to censor my comments. At least on CO it clearly says “advertisement” over the post. If you thought my “diaf” was anything but snarky internet banter then I apologize, I wish neither you nor the makers if this film anything but the best.

        • Theo says:

          Whoa — somebody did pull your comment. I’m a little surprised, but not very.
          And here we go again with the “censor” crap. This is not government, Nule, this is an entertainment blog, wholly owned by the Cheez peeps’ corporation. You act like an ass, and they can respond in whatever manner they choose. Their house, their rules. http://www.icanhascheezburger.com/terms-of-use/ I’m sure you know this, but it bears repeating.

          I agree with you to some extent, re: advertising that looks like regular content. You’re right, that’s why we added our own “ADVERTISEMENT” disclaimer (after some folks requested it). But I’d call this hybrid advertising. It’s a highly-targeted premium ad, formatted to fit into the local context. So somebody put forth a little effort here… though not with great success, I’ll concede. It’s the sort of thing you see on a poster in your dentist’s office, next to the little “Hang In There” kitten.

          ANYhow. Not my house either. But I deal with this regularly, elsewhere.

          • Nule says:

            It is “censorship”, Theo, but I don’t dispute that you’re right; it is “their house” and they are entitled to do as they please. I feel no rights of mine have been violated. I’m trying to be sympathetic to the parties involved, and certainly to C.O., which is a blog I admire, but I do take exception to the sentiment that I “act like an ass”.

            Look, I express my disdain to my Vet for the very same reason you bring up; she posts advertisements in the office that appear as entertainment, or factoids or whatever, but they’re there to get me to buy pet insurance that I don’t need or food that’s not necessarily any better for the animal even if it is “organic” and whatever. That same disdain I feel towards newspapers or any other medium, including animal blogs, that don’t disclose their interest in a particular article or post. Blogs are trusted sources these days and they should feel obliged to maintain certain editorial standards. Something less obnoxious may have slid under the radar, but this post on this site is unfunny and obviously just there to drive traffic to a third party site.

            Anyway, peace and love to you and the folks at C.O. Sorry if I rubbed anybody the wrong way, I just wish it to be known that I don’t appreciate any blog treating me as a reader in this manner.

            • Theo says:

              Actually I meant the phrase “you act like an ass” to be conditional. Like, if you act like an ass, they can treat you like an ass. My bad. Friday sloppy.

    • Phil says:

      At least C.O. had the honesty to label it “ADVERTISEMENT” right out there in the open.

      …they did not, I note, have the courage to leave the comments turned on for it, however.

      I’m going to side with the masses on this one: if you want to advertise your unbelievably crappy movie, buy space over in the increasingly-large advertising space on the site – NOT THE CONTENT AREA.

      If you /absolutely must/ advertise your unbelievably crappy movie, at least try and make your caption sound less like a Hallmark card for somebody’s brain-damaged daughter.

    • CottlestonPie says:

      As a matter of fact, Theo, I agree with the “trolls” on this one. I just haven’t said anything on CO, because I knew you didn’t want to hear it. But I agree with Phil below, that content and content only should go where the posts go. What if two or three (or all) of the advertisers decide they want their ads in the content space? They pay for it, they’re entitled to it, right? But then, where are you going to put the stuff your visitors (who are presumably being targeted by the ads) want to see?

      • Theo says:

        Heh, I’d forgotten your other screen name. Hi.

        Advertisers can only buy what’s available, you know. I very much doubt there’d ever be more than one inline ad slot available at once.

        The one on CO is only running for a limited time, btw. Meg actually told me when it was due to expire, but it was late and I forgot.

  26. |55555| says:

    These aren’t cats. They’re dogs. Kill them with fire.

  27. turtlol says:

    iz ok to has goggies heer. We ebben has burdies and turtlols and sharkz and golfins and awl kinda otter fun critters. Heck, we ebben had a wal wunce (dismember: Emo Wall?) an a chare, tu.

    duzzint has to awl wayz be kittehs, just has tu be kyoote, rite?

    cheez….and hoo let teh trolz in?
    “Girls, do you have that grail-shaped light on again?”

  28. Tom says:

    I think it’s fine for dogs to be on the site, but I disagree with using captions on a poster to make a poorly disguised advertisement.

  29. chaat says:

    I’ve also never commented here before, and feel inclined to after seeing this. It’s not the fact that it’s an ad that bothers me. It’s the fact that this “lol” was made COMPLETELY not in the spirit of ICHC and the lolcat meme.

    See, the “inspirational motif” is meant to be used ironically. Here, it is used completely unironically, without a hint of cleverness. The inspirational message appears to actually be meant to be inspirational, and this is unacceptable.

    Granted, this particular example happens to be an ad for a movie, but I would not be at all shocked to see this identical image show up on the front page here these days.

    Go back and look at the archives – the first 30 or 40 pages or so. You won’t find a single image that is devoid of irony or cleverness. There’s a certain sense of humour that ICHC and the lolcat meme were founded on, it has been completely lost over the last few months, and I have a theory why.

    Moms.

    ICHC has been taken over by moms.

    Moms have no sense of irony. Their once razor-sharp wits have been dulled into submission by biology. They lose their ability to see beyond face-value. Sarcasm and subtlety are completely lost on moms. All they are concerned about is base-level cuteness.

    It doesn’t have to be that way.

    Moms – I have a mission for you. Your mission is to go to a used bookstore, online or otherwise, and pick up a couple of Woody Allen books. Without Feathers or Side Effects. Then netflix yourself a few discs of the BBC program Peep Show.

    Until you regain your ability to snark, feel free to enjoy ICHC and write in “lolspeak” in the comments. Just please do not create your own lols.

    Friendship, companionship, love, positivity, adorableness – these things are all wonderful and heartwarming. But they are not funny. There is nothing funny about a cat who is dressed up and looks mad. All cats look mad if you dress them up. Cats don’t like to be dressed up. We get it. Ditto: baths.

    This is not Garfield, moms, nor is it the Family Circus. Please, for the love of deceptively clever comedy, stop creating lols until you get your mojo back.

    • mamarosa says:

      Yur right Sir.

      Ai hab been infiltrat…..infultat…..taken over.

      *smashes collection of Precious Moments figurines*

      * tears apart all Cathy comics*

      Ai needz to go to BBC immediatelies.
      Ai feelz teh kyoote unfunnehness trying to getz in mai brainz.

      DO NAWT WANT poor sense ov humors adn Ai iz only a kitteh mom!

      Pleh!!

      Ceiling Cat, help us awl.

    • gascat says:

      hi there, yes, it’s me again. I call foul.

      ICHC is full of all kinds of people, the only common bond is that we all love our kitties. Now, you seem to be entirely missing the point. we know that all cats hate being dressed up and all that too. We just like it because it’s funny, It hasn’t been overused at all. You also forget that no picture makes it to the front page without being voted on first. Now by your logic, this must mean that there are a lot of dim-witted moms out there, which I frankly find preposterous. Also, “base level cuteness”? have you even been out here? only once in a blue moon does a purely cuteness-based picture show up. This site is dedicated to the spirit of comedy.

      Oh and one other thing: do. not. f***ing. blame. all. mediocrity. on. moms.
      there are many reasons why ICHC went through a slump. and the largest one was young kids who took lolspeak as an excuse to spell badly and use bad grammar. Now shut up and leave.

      regards, gascat

  30. Wombatish says:

    I dislike this blatant ad (at least they made it blatant, though)….

    BUT Pedigree is donating to shelters across the US for everyone who sees this movie…. so as bad as it will probably be, I will probably trek out to see it.

    However: ICHC? No in blog ads, please. Tell them to buy a sidebar or gtfo. (Or at least let you label it an ad or something).

  31. t says:

    wayyyyy too positive for this site!

  32. Hatedogs says:

    Can we please maintain segregation here ?

  33. Phillipe d'Beaker says:

    oooh. commentroversy. trolls. commentroversy and trolls. so ai cannot resist putting my too sense wurth. here goes.
    .
    ai will make the charitiblol assumpshun that wut happened here is that sumwun mad a lol, in the new “insprashunul poster” mode, wif a picshur from the movie. hence the movie stamp in the lower corner. but the lol itself is nawt an ad.
    .
    then, why it is here insted of on hotdog? gud queshun, and there will be xtry credits fer anywun hoo gets it right. Hint: did you notice that the picshur on hawtdog at the same time had a kitteh in it?
    .
    final kweshun: anybuddy notice taht it only takes up a few hours of yer time, and provides opportooonity for exercise of humor and irony in the comments? anybuddy notice the need fer lives to be gotten sumtimes? ok, eberybuddy take a deep bref and repeet … “it’z only a lol. it’z only a lol …”
    kthnxbai.

  34. yasoup says:

    The movie was cute enough for the Nickelodeon set, but I wouldn’t rec it to my nieces or nephews. Not worth the theater or the fuss–which is probably why it was released in January, advertised constantly on Nick, and had a McDonald’s Happy Meal promotion.

  35. LoLa says:

    I could forgive the commercial if it was at least funny. FAIL.

  36. hmmmm says:

    *playin debbulz adbokitteh*
    Cheezland iz free for us wut enjoy teh lolcats, so why upset abowt 1 liddo goggie ad?

    Peas adn luv adn har moan ee. :D

    • Phil says:

      Passing off ads as content is incredibly lame. Wanna advertise? Buy a banner. Content is for _content_ – if you start slipping ads in there (especially when they aren’t marked as “PAID AD”) then your site’s become nothing but a shill.

    • Daybid says:

      I gess it beetz payin a memmership fee.

  37. Laughingrat says:

    CRY CRY

    WAI MY LOLZ NEVR MAEK 2 FRONT PAGE BUT MUVIE AD PRITENDIN 2 BE LOL AKSHULLY DO

  38. Chelsea says:

    uhh…….shouldnt this be on loldogs not lolcats?

  39. multiputtytats says:

    This is the first pic on the main page that had me wishing for a “zero cheezburgers” voting icon.

    There are two glaring problems with this “submission”: First, it’s not funny, especially in the way ICHC readers expect. The photo is passably cute if overly staged, but the caption (oops, capshun) is Ziggy-like in its saccharin lifelessness and the synergy between the two is non-existent. Bereft of typical ICHC appeal, it sticks out like the proverbial sore thumb/paw compared to the other pics. Which leads to the second problem; It can’t possibly have made it to the main page without being a paid-for advertisement. It even credits Paramount as well as the movie and links to the movie’s website. The very disappointing ICHC book also seemed driven more by greed than content, but at least it was/is separate from the site. By putting this bald-faced ad on the main page, you’ve spat in the eye of every contributor to whom you owe a debt of gratitude.

    Shame on you, ICHC. A Disheartening Sellout.

    • Phil says:

      [applause]
      Let’s see how long your critical comment stays up – the ICHC mods have nuked two of mine already (yeah, one had a link in it to a pic on the LOLcat builder, but the other was just commentary).

    • JD says:

      Excellent. Thanks for saving me some typing. ;)

  40. GCH Loki says:

    i rated this a 5 coz it adverts a movie 2 animal luvrz wivout displaying a bunch of dancing idiots or pop-up ads or viral adware.

    • Phil says:

      Really? I rated it a ‘1′ because it’s simply not funny at all. If I had only known that “effectiveness in marketing a movie” was one of the factors we should be rating LOLs on, I’d have given it eleventy!

      …no, I lied. 1 burger, and that’s being aaaaawfully generous.

      Seriously, GCH Loki: are you coming here because you want to see movie advertisements or because you want to see hilarious LOLcats?

      • GCH Loki says:

        I agree wiv u, and if this happned all teh time, i’d get miffed. (And I think if dis was promoting a Cat movie, it’d be more appropriate — heh!) All that aside, however, I’m a bit concerned with the invasive techniques being used by some of teh advertisers. A number of visitors to this site had our puters attacked by adware viruses during the past week. It worries me what some of these advertisers are embedding into their ads, and angers me that anyone wuld attempt to use this site as a medium to infect personal computers.

        So…I was sort of tongue in cheek venting when I posted above. Coz yeah, I come here to LOL and splort. hee,

        I don’t mind the ads, coz I know they go to pay for this site and some of wot is advertised is directed to the type uf folks dat visit heer, But I don’t like it when pop-ups and floaties invade my screen — and I definitely don’t want anyone here to get hurt by puter viruses. Especially Cheez and Tofu who work hard to make this site fun!

        Group hug ebrywun! hee

  41. cocoa says:

    Those definitely look like cats…

    shouldn’t this go under i has a hotdog?

  42. :P says:

    ICHS no has a hot dog, sorryz.

  43. Skye Song says:

    varee troo cocoa… i duzint eavun laik goggies…
    thats iz wai ai reed i can has cheezburger!!!

  44. ritabby says:

    JUMPED THE SHARKIE!

    Someone above spoke the truth. Moms (and I am one) have taken the edge off of ICHC. Witness the kittieh with the kissie on his head. And the caption something like “Grandma Kisses.” WOW! How witty is that? But, theoretically, what appears on the front page is voted on by the masses.

    Something needs to be done to bring back the FUNNY.

    We need checks and balances.

    Will someone please start ICHC 2.0?

    • gascat says:

      fine. How do you propose to choose front page pictures?
      can you come up with a better system than voting?

      because if you can, great, submit it to the burgers and wait for response,

      otherwise, stop complaining about things you can’t change

      • Wiggles says:

        How about: normal weighting of votes up to about 500 or so. But after that, negative votes start counting more. The more total votes, the more negative votes get weighted.

        If done right this could restore some sort of spread of scores, not 4.8 to 5.0 as we currently have.

  45. calyx says:

    DISINGENUOUS ADVERTAINMENT FAIL

    Man this just put me off the site in a big big way.

  46. Noobalox says:

    de avalansh has started
    iz 2 late 4 de pebbles to vote

    enjoy ur failvertisements

  47. lovelylulu22 says:

    i liek kittez bettur

  48. flogbishop says:

    worst lol ever.

  49. Homestar says:

    Woulda made more sense if it was on Ihasahotdog, and even then its a boring picture thats an ad for a movie that will with no doubt flop.

    I’ll give them one thing though, at least they used the poster builder instead of the breaking news builder. THAT would have really been pushing it.

  50. kitteh says:

    diz is as gud as goin to a show of bil cosby

  51. Maus says:

    *Gets a bar of soap*
    *Sticks it in lolllllllllolololol’s mouth*
    Watch your language!

  52. OriginalFatCats says:

    You’re an idiot for trolling ICHC. You took the time to post something that will have no impact on the fun that happens here. Your efforts are futile; you sir, fail.

    Go back to your hate-forums and troll there, so you can insult other to make yourself feel better.

  53. 2minions says:

    Ai agrees! Dis purrfect egg sample ov difference between dont-liek-it commints an trolls.
    .
    Dont-liek-it comments iz legitimate, you-people insults iz nawt.
    .
    An dat werd iz inappropriate, wuteber yur opinion ov policitlol correctniss.
    .
    (Dat sed, hoo VOTED fur tihs?)


Your comment

 

 

Search

ICHC Daily Email


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Fluffy Tag Cloud

  • Oldies But Goodies

  • Who be Talkin'

    bluesfan473 on Thank you
    annipuss on Thank you
    annipuss on Thank you
    honeycakerabbit on Thank you
    Q. on Thank you
    carosue on Thank you
    KemysteryTchr on Thank you
    sweetpea on Thank you
    4point5kittehs on Thank you
    annipuss on Thank you
    carosue on Thank you
    cweenmj on Thank you
    sweetpea on Thank you
    bluesfan473 on Thank you
    annipuss on Thank you
  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even Moar Lolz