Click to see All Kittehs | Captions Only | Videos Only

 

« Previous | Next »


Mohammed Cat


12357.jpeg

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 97 comments

  1. Deb says:

    S’cuze me but why u mislabel Native American ruins at Mesa Verde Colorado as site of jihad? U not noe yur geography? LOL

    • Leigh says:

      Yay! Someone came up with the REAL problem with this picture! It’s not offensive to Muslims, it’s offensive to Native Americans!

      whew. i feel much better now….
      o, wayt. no i dont.

    • c'mon says:

      Yeah, we’re talking Anasazi ruins. That is so stupid.

    • Lena says:

      Hahaha. Dude, that be Mesa Verde in Colorado.
      Not a place in the middle east.
      Total geography skills there

  2. Poopy says:

    This was so messed up and random it made me laugh out loud.

  3. Becca says:

    I think it is meant to be ironic in that sense, Deb.

    but seriously folkz, lol. Bravoz.

  4. A says:

    This is ridiculous. I find it offensive.

  5. Bob says:

    I find this cat offensive I will bomb Puebloz for no rational reason!

  6. B says:

    I find it offensive too… kinda… =\

  7. iluvcheezburger says:

    i agree.. not diggin this one. offensive.

  8. Jaime says:

    Oh please, totally not offensive at ALL. Allah approves, Jesus told me.

  9. Kerrick says:

    Yes, also offensive, AND ignorant. Come on, folks, do something funny.

  10. Enamor says:

    How can a picture thats funny be offensive to anybody???
    Get a grip or go find chat forums for these types of rants!! It makes me sad that the kind of people who take the time to look at cute pics of kittens turn out to be such arseholes!! Saddens me and all true cat lovers with a sense of humour. Please just say it a cute/funny picture then move on!

    • Willy says:

      indeed. anyone to find a PICTURE of anything to be offensive needs to pull the stick from their arse and move on. there are soooo many other things in this world to be upset about.

    • Craigenator says:

      Totally. Its funny for at least two resons. When are people just going to learn to laugh at stuff intead of being babies and always getting offended. I would laugh harmlessly if it was Jesus cat or something. Why not? Laugh at ourselves AND each other…

      • Cat-apult says:

        Craigenator, I wish everyone had your attitude – but sadly, you can’t ask “common sense” and “lightheartedness” of muslims. They complain about eeeeeeeeeeeverything. A friggin’ atom is offensive because it wasn’t blessed by the blood of a sacrifice to allah (which usually means some kind of barbaric, middle-aged murder). You pegged the absolutely correct term: babies. In fact, babies have more sense.

  11. Headless says:

    It’s not exactly hard to offend islamo nutbars, is it?

  12. Muslimah says:

    Not funny =/ The Mohammed part was offensive.

  13. PC says:

    Funny stuff!

  14. Noorie says:

    umm I think this can be taken in a really bad way… Not very cool.. :( Love the site but this pic made me sad.

    • Baraku says:

      Yeah, I think this has a rather significant meaning–Ceiling cat doesn’t APPROVE of what he watches, does he? I don’t think Mohamed cat does either.

      Mohamed cat sez cut the crap, k?

  15. Muhammed Al BlingBling says:

    Making fun of christians is OK BY ALLAH
    Making fun of Islam is WRONG.

    lol

    • fls says:

      why is it okay to make fun of christens and not muslems? we should not take ofense of some little picture when there are so many other problems.

  16. z says:

    lol drawerings of teh mohamiddz

  17. chica says:

    Not to mention that jihad is a movement, not a people — but really how offensive can it be — I mean we are all here looking at pictures of cats with quips.

    • Tamim says:

      The reason this is offensive is because this picture is mocking Muhammad, a very beloved prophet in Islam. Portrayals of him are strictly against our religion, and to see an ANIMAL portraying him is much, much worse.

  18. Jewel says:

    i m in ur puebloz

    bein ur catgod

    must worship!

  19. mental18 says:

    derka derka, alkida, muhhamid, derka derka

  20. dreads says:

    its just like bush lol

    racists very much..

  21. Steven Bhardwaj says:

    if only “gee-hod” in inglish kontext
    reeferd to reeding self-help bux like it shud,
    insted of reefereng to bomming n crud…

  22. lolben says:

    how is this offensive, its just a bit of fun.

    omgl2p

  23. Sassy says:

    Give me a break – this is FREAKIN HILLARIOUS!!!! Whoever thinks it’s not funny should go back to whatever dessert they hail and work on there suicide missions!
    IN AMERICA WE SHOULD NOT BE AFRAID!!!

  24. mina says:

    i find this offensive, sorry. you may live in america but some people people might be living in some other place and they might find it offensive. give us a break, not everyone has humor in EVERYTHING :)

  25. The lord of the cats says:

    I am religious and find this really offensive. In my religion a cat is sacred and for it be compared to Mohammad I find really unfunny.

  26. Azinomoto says:

    ahhhhhhh CHIT u has me rofl w/ dis1!!!!!1

    y all de1s me findz phunniest not 5bgrs? dubble u tee eff!!!!!

    btw… phunnier4dose who kno ceilin kat… lulz

  27. catnmoose says:

    Um, I think it’s not so much offensive as it is poorly put together. Mesa Verde has so many other facets that could be turned into a smart joke that wouldn’t be viewed as offensive to Native Americans, Muslims or anyone. This picture is just really kinda lame.

    In summation: Yoos yr fotoschop skilz for to mayk teh kittis. No want dum stuf!

  28. rawrrawr says:

    wow it’s embarrassing, really, that a freakin picture of a kittehkat is turning into like a religious debate.
    really shows the level of intelligence people have. or not.
    honestly. people say offensive shit that is sometimes funny.
    get over it. you do it too
    think of every time you’ve sat there and wrongly judged someone
    you are just as bad.

  29. josh says:

    lol lol loli luv this site 2 funny makes me happy wen i down especially monorail cat

  30. balthazar says:

    kitteh sez this iz as offensuv as the first amurican flag bein’ made of hemp in a kuntry wher nip is not kosher. kitteh says is havin hard time keepin trak of all hiz jihads. maybe less nip. no. more nip. more nip make jihads go away.

  31. kittehluv says:

    Personally i found this funny :) whoever says it’s racist could kindly point out to me exactly how because I’m not seeing any racism.

  32. vpmeister says:

    If hoomans had to work all day finding food or sleeping you would not have time for such ranting drivel.

  33. moira_fae says:

    Er, it’s not that I’m offended by this … I just don’t get how Anasazi ruins have anything to do with Mohammed or Jihad …

  34. First, Mohammad (pbuh) did go up to Mount Hira to reflect on the world and God. Seems like Mount Hira looks a lot like Anasazi ruins. (see link)

    Second, I’m not a Muslim, and peace be upon everyone, including you, anyway.

    Third, our dictionaries *and* our vernacular have the word “Jihad” all wrong. See example from Wordnet by Princeton University. (retrieved from Dictionary.com)

    jihad
    noun
    1. a holy war waged by Muslims against infidels
    2. a holy struggle or striving by a Muslim for a moral or spiritual or political goal

    This is probably the way most of the world uses “jihad,” but it is the wrong emphasis according to Islamic doctrine. In Islam, definition #2 is called the “Greater Jihad,” and is primary and overriding. Definition #2 is the “Lesser Jihad”, and is an unfortunate consequence of ancient culture and economics. Like Christian-sanctioned African slavery in the Americas.

    Regardless of historic-critical views, I believe that any Muslim who thinks definition #1 is more important ought to review their Koran and Hadith.

    If you consider definition #2, this is a beautiful kitteh cartoon, one of my favorites.

  35. Steven Bhardwaj says:

    Ack! I miswrote: Definition #1 is the Lesser Jihad.

  36. ME says:

    When I was in this cave last night, this angel of light carried Mohamed down to me and he told me that he thinks he has to has this picture framed up on his wall. Mohamed said that Allah want a copy.

  37. Lukas says:

    Maybe you should not let the minority of the muslims (who do blow themselves, and others, up for their political statements) destroy the future of the next generation of muslims who might someday rule your pathetic, hypocritical, rascist country. thank you very much for your movies btw:P

  38. Ella says:

    People take things to personal these days, jeez.

    *Laughs butt off* Brilliant

  39. D_Rizzle says:

    I think people need to mellow out here.

    There are a million different portrayals of the several million denominations out there that you AREN’T offended by. You laugh at dumb blonde jokes? Well it’s the same thing. Please don’t try and argue otherwise. The only difference is that one generalizes a religious stereotype while the other uses hair colour as a punchline Either could be equally as hurt by the remarks…therefore laughing at one isn’t any more right or wrong than not doing over the other. So just sit back, calm down, relax, and learn to have a good laugh..whether at the expense of yourself or others. Seriously though…you’re all gonna give yourself heart-attacks. There are bigger things to worry about than a cat macro.

  40. Rain says:

    yay lol)) wonders if da author be alrdy killd or not?

  41. Rain says:

    Oh and btw dis no same thing. Religion is moar serious then haer kalor… So its ratr offensive, despite being wholly lol.

  42. Chris says:

    Interesting how no-one comes over all ‘zomgzzz, it R teh offensiveneess to teh cristians’ when people post your average celing cat macro, don’t ya think?

  43. ulysses says:

    Don’t say “How can you be offended, it’s just a cat pic” because it’s NOT just a cat pic. It’s a cat pic that somebody chose to politicize by the caption they chose. Don’t blame me for noticing that you’ve got an obnoxious political message in there. YOU brought politics into the funny pages with YOUR stupid crap, not me.
    I’m not saying it’s offensive to Muslims, I’m saying it’s annoying to ME, an AMERICAN because of these reasons:
    1. It’s obviously made by an American, and a stupid one at that. On the WORLD-WIDE WEB, this helps perpetuate the myth that Americans in general are as stupid as the asshat who made this kittehlols.
    2. By implying that Mohammed is watching over “the Jihad” (which reminds us that Stupid Americans think Jihad means whitey-killin’) it reinforces the stupid-American stereotype that we’re not smart enough to differentiate between Islam and violent extremism.
    3. By mistaking a Native American site for a Muslim site, it reinforces the stereotype that Stupid Americans can’t tell deserts or brown people apart.

    So I would just like to remind all the viewers who AREN’T in the good ol’ U S of A: Let’s try not to judge each other by the actions of one or two pricks.

  44. The Stig says:

    I can see how this could be offensive but whether its Messiah cat or Mohammad cat, it’s all funny to me. For those of you that think this actually tarnishes Americas image, guess what, it went to hell a long time ago. Who gives a crap that its actually Native American ruins ? The image works well enough at resembling the middle east. The guy who made this was probably just looking for a desert cliff with a few buildings, and found this early on in his google image results. Oh yeah, by the way Lukas, this is America not Germany. The largest growing minority is hispanics not muslims so I highly doubt the next muslim generation will be taking over any time soon. Also do you want to know what an actual horrible, pathetic, intolerant country is, Iran. There, the guy who made this would be mercilessly executed in the name of extremist Islam. Sorry for the deviation towards the end, Its just I don’t like people shitting on America because of a silly cat picture.

  45. XDenmarkX says:

    Oh sons of cow will not stop until all in your e-Down
    O grandsons of apes and pigs …
    Paul cow disease have made safe water you

  46. lord of the cats says:

    I think images like these are causing serious religious conflict and undermining community cohesion. Just yesterday, my cat saw this image and then took a shit on local Christian churches door step. The Priest’s dog then retaliated and pissed on my cat flap.

  47. Darathem says:

    On one level, I have no idea how to take this.

    The picture itself seems harmless enough- whether the ruins are native american, or middle eastern in nature seems above and beyond the issue at heart.

    There are quite a few sides to this interesting debate, so let me, for a second, hit the neutral zone.

    I can easily see how many might find this picture offensive. But then, no one forces anyone to come to this site and look at these pictures. In that case, perhaps this might be rated PG-13 on the off chance that someone might decide not to look at it? It could have ‘religious reasons’ printed under it in parenthesis, if anyone needed a reason.

    On the other hand, it’s an image with a cat photoshopped into a picture of ruins with a stupid- if mildly amusing- caption printed underneath it. If someone can’t handle it, I doubt it would ruin their day. It’s a picture for cripes sake. Not a new holy book, or a hint as to the second coming. I myself tend not to be very religious.

    To get yourself worked up over something like this seems rather pointless. Either look at it, or don’t. No one holds a gun to your head. It was meant to be funny. The person in question may have had bad taste, and yes, I can see how it might offend, but I don’t think that, in a site like this- with so many other things to be offended by- it really is all that big of a deal.

    However…

    Religion is a personal matter, and a good many people will not take it as I do. Perhaps this picture really is better scrapped.

  48. Logan says:

    Guys… it’s a picture of a cat… the word Mohammed is on it…

    Would this be less offensive if the cat was representing the Buddha? Vishnu? Lucifer? The Christ?

    Good God I am so tired of this PeeCee society.

    Leave me hate mail.

  49. Emily912 says:

    Pritee pikshur. Rong kulchur. No kitteh. ‘s okay, pikshur very pritee.

  50. Connor says:

    How is it that this is offensive and celing cat isnt? i understand that those ruins dont have anything to do with islam but it really looks like somewhere that would so shush. there i said it

  51. Omar says:

    The picture itself, without the caption, is lame as my harbles. And, with the captions it is just worse. I’m not religious by the way, but holy shit! That picture did not make me happy. I won’t say what would you do if I put up a picture of something close and say Jesus Cat. Well I wouldn’t dare to. In my religion – Islam – Jesus Christ is holy and sacred. And he’s the one that would come and save the earth from the Omen. Every other prophet is sacred in my religion. so I would never dare to direct such an insult to a prophet.

    Do you know my prophet? No you don’t.

  52. Nadia says:

    Well said Omar.

    The picture itself is harmless, its the caption that gives it a politically incorrect meaning.

    What’s more offensive than the actual caption? The ignorance and stupidity of some of the blasphemous comments.

    Do you see any insulting comments about the pope? No, because the muslims on this site are not stupid.

  53. Mrowr says:

    OMGeeeeeeeeeee
    IT.
    IS NOT.
    OFFENSIVE.
    Hide in your basement if you’re afraid of being offended.
    By a PICTURE. Yes, WITH A CAPTION.
    JEEZ.

  54. Lydia says:

    Geography…
    ur doin it wrong.

  55. collegekitteh says:

    Did not see the posting above….. Thanks for clearing that up, Mr. Bhardwaj.

  56. blazethefirefox says:

    *TINY PERSON* hey mom look a cat that is tring to eat us should we …….MOM WHERE R U

  57. Mohammed says:

    It’s fine, really. Lighten up.

  58. fifa says:

    why u hav to put captions like dat in here..religion is not sumthin 2 b messed with..an offensive joke for a muslim…

  59. bloodskull says:

    where is your god now?

  60. writerphobic says:

    See the thing is that , maybe religion to this erm caption maker is just going to church and saying jesus and stuff. But to muslims its a whole different thing. When you bring in America, lets just not forget America’s first constitutional law? Tolerant of every sex,race,religion? Im pretty sure americans abide by it to some extent why dont you?

    Harping on the fact that this is offensive and this isnt wont matter much to you would it? In the end it makes no difference because you took out your narrowed knowledge about geography and muslims and yes ‘desert’ in a picture. Please grow up and come out big :) that is addressing your knowledge on a much larger scale, I would then question your authenticity

    And yes this picture is offensive but lets not make it a big deal. I knew it was enough when someone said “I use bible as my footrest”. I dont mean to stereotype this statement for everyone but i would for anyone who disregards his own teachings and religion and goes around defaming other religions. Peace be on you!

  61. The Guy with a circle box says:

    SERIOUSLY!? its been 3 years!!! GIVE UP! Your creator gave you a sense of humor, and if you dont use it, theyll slap u silly when you meet them. Ceiling Cat FTW.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up